c# - VS2010 / Target Framework = 3.5 / Building on Continuous Integration Server -

-

i'm checking upgrading vs2010.

our production servers have 3.5 framework , 6-9 months before updated.

we have continuous integration server, running cruisecontrol.net (cc.net). has 3.5 framework on well. our implementation of cc.net calls msbuild.exe mysolution.msbuild. (we encapsulate of build logic .msbuild files fyi)

inside .msbuild file, following "build" syntax: < target name="build" dependsontargets="checkout"> < msbuild projects="$(workingcheckout)\mysolution.sln" targets="build" properties="configuration=$(configuration)"> < output taskparameter="targetoutputs" itemname="targetoutputsitemname">< /output> < /msbuild> < /target>

(a few spaces added make display here)

===========

i know vs2010 can "target" 3.5 framework.

my question happens when have vs2010 dev machine, , check vs2010 .sln , .csproj(s) files source control (svn, btw).....will cc.net machine ~~which have 3.5 framework installed on it........be able build .sln ?

i guess test it, catch22 don't have vs2010 (yet). i'm asking before try (the trial or real install.

.............

any ideas happen?

i guess crux question is, happen.

c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v3.5\msbuild.exe "myvs2010solutionfile.sln"

??

my hopeful goal be, allow developers have vs2010 (now!), , still "ok" cc.net machine , production servers have 3.5 framework on them foreseeable future.

just clear, developers never create deployable builds. cc.net machine produces builds pushed production builds.

any help?

i don't think so.

here work, have vs2010 projects targeting 3.5 being built cruisecontrol.net. 'gotcha' believe, v4.0 of msbuild being used - because csproj files target 3.5, runs nicely.

it pain making sure cctray wasn't barfing @ though.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - Enclosure Memory Copies -

-
function myclass() { //lots , lots of vars , code here. this.bar = function() { //do numerous enclosed myclass vars } this.foo = function() { alert('hello'); //don't enclosed variables. } } each instance of myclass gets own copy of bar , foo, why prototyped methods use less memory. however, know more memory use of inner methods. it seems obvious me (1) below must true. agree? not distinct myclass instances have own distinct copies of bar, must have own distinct copies of myclass enclosure. (or else how bar method keep myclass variables straight on per instance basis?) now (2) question i'm after. since inner foo method doesn't use in myclass enclosure natural qustion is: javascript smart enough not keep myclass enclosure in memory use of foo? this depend entirely on implementation not language. naive implementations keep far more around others. answer true e.g. v8 (chrome's js engine) may not true spider...
Read more

php - Replacing tags in braces, even nested tags, with regex -

-
example preg_replace('/\{[a-za-z.,\(\)0-9]+\}/', 'replaced', 'lorem ipsum dolor sit {tag1({tag2()})}, consectetur adipiscing elit.'); the result: lorem ipsum dolor sit {tag1(replaced)}, consectetur adipiscing elit. question as can see "tag2" has been replaced, want replace "tag1" know how can this? (in cases might this: {tag1({tag2({tag3()})})}) , on.) btw using preg_replace_callback, easier show preg_replace here site can test code: http://www.spaweditor.com/scripts/regex/index.php you need add curly braces character set. here's pattern used: /\{[a-za-z.,\(\)\{\}0-9]+\}/ and here result: "lorem ipsum dolor sit replaced, consectetur adipiscing elit."
Read more