c# - Catching a SoapException thrown by a WebService -

-

i wrote following service : 

namespace webservice1 {     [webservice(namespace = "http://tempuri.org/")]     [webservicebinding(conformsto = wsiprofiles.basicprofile1_1)]     [system.componentmodel.toolboxitem(false)]     public class service1 : system.web.services.webservice     {         [webmethod]         public string test(string str)         {             if (string.isnullorempty(str))                 throw new soapexception("message", soapexception.clientfaultcode);             else                 return str;         }     } }

and basic application test (one button calling test method on click event): 

private void button1_click(object sender, eventargs e) {     servicereference1.service1soapclient ws = new windowsformsapplication1.servicereference1.service1soapclient();      try     {         ws.test("");     }     catch (soapexception ex)     {          //i never go here     }     catch (faultexception ex)     {         //always go there     }     catch (exception ex)     {      } }

i'd catch soapexception thrown webservice, go faultexception catch block message:

system.web.services.protocols.soapexception: message @ webservice1.service1.test(string str) in [...]webservice1\webservice1\service1.asmx.cs:line 25

how catch real soapexception, , not faultexception? there miss in webservice?

i think main "problem" using wcf service reference connecting asp.net web service (.asmx).

the "easiest" way handle use web reference instead of wcf service reference on client. selecting "advanced" button on bottom of add service reference dialog, , add web reference on bottom of screen. believe using web reference should give soapexception.

the correct way (if want follow microsofts advice) publish wcf service instead of .asmx service. whole other chapter though..


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - Enclosure Memory Copies -

-
function myclass() { //lots , lots of vars , code here. this.bar = function() { //do numerous enclosed myclass vars } this.foo = function() { alert('hello'); //don't enclosed variables. } } each instance of myclass gets own copy of bar , foo, why prototyped methods use less memory. however, know more memory use of inner methods. it seems obvious me (1) below must true. agree? not distinct myclass instances have own distinct copies of bar, must have own distinct copies of myclass enclosure. (or else how bar method keep myclass variables straight on per instance basis?) now (2) question i'm after. since inner foo method doesn't use in myclass enclosure natural qustion is: javascript smart enough not keep myclass enclosure in memory use of foo? this depend entirely on implementation not language. naive implementations keep far more around others. answer true e.g. v8 (chrome's js engine) may not true spider...
Read more

php - Replacing tags in braces, even nested tags, with regex -

-
example preg_replace('/\{[a-za-z.,\(\)0-9]+\}/', 'replaced', 'lorem ipsum dolor sit {tag1({tag2()})}, consectetur adipiscing elit.'); the result: lorem ipsum dolor sit {tag1(replaced)}, consectetur adipiscing elit. question as can see "tag2" has been replaced, want replace "tag1" know how can this? (in cases might this: {tag1({tag2({tag3()})})}) , on.) btw using preg_replace_callback, easier show preg_replace here site can test code: http://www.spaweditor.com/scripts/regex/index.php you need add curly braces character set. here's pattern used: /\{[a-za-z.,\(\)\{\}0-9]+\}/ and here result: "lorem ipsum dolor sit replaced, consectetur adipiscing elit."
Read more