.net - Force NCover 1.5.8 to use v4 framework like testdriven.net does? -

-

i want run coverage command line, can't seem ncover 1.5.8 instrument code. must possible when run coverage tests testdriven.net works. difference seems td.net able ncover use framework 4.0 (you in log when runs : message: v4.0.30319) command line can't make (i in log : message: v2.0.50727)

so how can make ncover play nice nunit commandline, td.net?

after more searching found this:

if have found thread because trying ncover 1.5.8 work .net 4 following should fix error:

open command prompt , type following set complus_profapi_profilercompatibilitysetting=enablev2profiler

this instructs .net 4 clr load .net framework 2.0 profiler.

for more information see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd778910.aspx

at end of thread here

which seems solve problem

edit:

it doesn't solve problem really. allows coverage.xml generated, contains v2.0 framework assemblies, .net 2.0 assemblies profiled....

grrr. drawing board...

edit 2

hallelujah! have figured out process of random googling , changing. anyway, due pointers found here able figure out needed alter exe.config of application running code (nunit.console-x86.exe in case) file not force specific version of .net framework loaded allow legacy activation policy used. cut long story short able solve by:

  • adding nunit-console-x86.exe.config following section:
<configuration>       <startup uselegacyv2runtimeactivationpolicy="true">           <supportedruntime version="v4.0.30319"/>       </startup>   </configuration>

  • setting these in environment command launched from:

    set profapi_profilercompatibilitysetting=enablev2profiler
    set complus_profapi_profilercompatibilitysetting=enablev2profiler
    (not sure both necessary, that's did)

i added similar setting ncover.console.exe.config, turns out unnecessary.

edit 3

this command line using (note copied of ncover , nunit , test assemblies 1 directory simplify things)

ncover.console.exe nunit-console-x86.exe /framework=4.0.30319 your.test.assembly.dll //x coverage.xml //reg


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - Enclosure Memory Copies -

-
function myclass() { //lots , lots of vars , code here. this.bar = function() { //do numerous enclosed myclass vars } this.foo = function() { alert('hello'); //don't enclosed variables. } } each instance of myclass gets own copy of bar , foo, why prototyped methods use less memory. however, know more memory use of inner methods. it seems obvious me (1) below must true. agree? not distinct myclass instances have own distinct copies of bar, must have own distinct copies of myclass enclosure. (or else how bar method keep myclass variables straight on per instance basis?) now (2) question i'm after. since inner foo method doesn't use in myclass enclosure natural qustion is: javascript smart enough not keep myclass enclosure in memory use of foo? this depend entirely on implementation not language. naive implementations keep far more around others. answer true e.g. v8 (chrome's js engine) may not true spider...
Read more

php - Replacing tags in braces, even nested tags, with regex -

-
example preg_replace('/\{[a-za-z.,\(\)0-9]+\}/', 'replaced', 'lorem ipsum dolor sit {tag1({tag2()})}, consectetur adipiscing elit.'); the result: lorem ipsum dolor sit {tag1(replaced)}, consectetur adipiscing elit. question as can see "tag2" has been replaced, want replace "tag1" know how can this? (in cases might this: {tag1({tag2({tag3()})})}) , on.) btw using preg_replace_callback, easier show preg_replace here site can test code: http://www.spaweditor.com/scripts/regex/index.php you need add curly braces character set. here's pattern used: /\{[a-za-z.,\(\)\{\}0-9]+\}/ and here result: "lorem ipsum dolor sit replaced, consectetur adipiscing elit."
Read more